Legal Question in Business Law in California
issuance of shares to employees
A company I worked for allowed workers to purchase shares after one year of employment. Me and several co-workers passed this mark, but we when inquired why we had not been offered shares, we were told that financial records were not kept up to date and without proper valuation they could not be issued. The company subsequently descended into financial turmoil and abruptly eliminated many positions, including my own. When asked, they would not give me an answer on the shares.
I'd gander that the answer is no, but do we have any legal ground to stand on? Certainly they may go bankrupt, but I suspect the possibility of a lucrative buyout.
4 Answers from Attorneys
Re: issuance of shares to employees
If the stock-purchase agreement was in writing, read it carefully! These agreements usually have many restrictions on the obligation of the company. While its reports to the SEC or whatever weren't up to snuff, it was probably forbidden by law to issue or sell stock to employees, and the contract probably covers the situation. Nevertheless, your right to acquire stock may survive this period and may become binding upon a purchaser, so with luck and the proper legal guidance you might still be rewarded if the failing company is bought (for whatever reason) for a big price.
Re: issuance of shares to employees
There are no 'lucrative buy outs' of insolvent or bankrupt companies, nor is their stock worth anything.
Re: issuance of shares to employees
If the original offer was in writing, and your inquiry was in writing, see an attorney. Otherwise, remember to document everything in writing next time.
Re: issuance of shares to employees
Would you want to buy shares in a company that's on the brink of bankruptcy? I'd say you're probably lucky that you -didn't- do so. You'd probably gain no jury sympathy if you were to bring a lawsuit and that were the issue. What damages would you have suffered by not buying worthless stock?