Legal Question in Business Law in California
In retaliation for, and in an effort to get out of the small claims case (for unpaid wages of $3500.00) , A small business owner files an unlimited civil case claiming "breach of contract" and "job abandonment". (moving the small claims against him up to superior court where he is not the plaintiff instead of defendant)
After discovery (and thousands in legal costs incurred by the defendant) finding that there is clear evidence to the contrary to his claims, drops his case. (he knew his claims were lies, just didn't know that we had proof of it.)
This person has been found to have filed 10 similar claims in the last 20 years.
In an effort to recover legal expenses, and hold him accountable for the abuse of the legal system, can they be sued for malicious prosecution?
4 Answers from Attorneys
Technically it is abuse of process. It is a disfavored claim, and all inferences are construed against the plaintiff, in order to protect people with legitimate if not ultimately successful disputes from being intimidated into not having their day in court. But if this guy had no case, knew he had no case, and filed entirely to dissuade you from pursuing your case by making it more difficult and expensive, you may be successful. If you are in Northern California and would like to discuss your case further, please feel free to give me a call.
Technically, it is malicious prosecution you're asking about, but I don't think you can satisfy all of the elements of that tort. The California Supreme Court says the elements of abuse of process are �first, an ulterior purpose, and second, a wilful act in the use of the process not proper in the regular conduct of the proceeding.� Barquis v. Merchants Collection Assn. (1977) 7 Cal.3d 94, at pp.103-104. As an example of qualifying improper conduct, the court cited filing lawsuits in the wrong county. The court has made it clear that malicious prosecution is distinguished from abuse of process in that the latter requires malice as a motive for bringing the suit whereas the former requires a deliberate improper act in the actual conduct of the suit.
One of the requirements for a malicious prosecution action is that the party to be named as defendant have had the previous prosecution (criminal or civil) fianlly decided, on its merits, in favor of the now plaintiff. In your case, there was a dismissal. You make it sound as though there was a voluntary dismissal by the then plaintiff, and that would not qualify as a decision in your favor by the court, on the merits. If there were an involuntary dismissal of the case by the court, that'd probably be sufficient, but that's not what you have, I assume.
Another possibility is that this guy might qualify as a vexatious litigant under Code of Civil Procedure section 391 (et seq.), if he has been filing and losing a lot of cases.
First you have to 'win' your case against him, and defeat his against you, before considering an action for malicious prosecution.
You can file an action for malicious prosecution, but you should be aware that you would most likely be subject to a SLAPP motion at the outset. If you lose that motion, the case would be dismissed and you would have to pay his attorney's fees.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Does LLC, registered in another state with that state's Secretary of State and... Asked 3/16/11, 4:45 pm in United States California Business Law
-
If something says less than 30 days does that mean it is too late ON day 30, since... Asked 3/15/11, 10:40 pm in United States California Business Law
-
Is it legal for a seller of a Restaurant to list Fixtures as assets, water heater,... Asked 3/14/11, 11:40 pm in United States California Business Law