Legal Question in Criminal Law in California
In California, is it possible to get evidence surpressed in a criminal trial? For example, my relative made a statement that was incorrect and did not corroborate my own because she suffers from senile dementia. Her statement is really the only evidence they have against me. Her health has since gotten much worse and I fear she will not be in a mental position to correct her previous statements. Is that enough grounds to get her statement removed from the evidence in a trial?
2 Answers from Attorneys
Evidence may be suppressed by appropriate motion for 'good cause' if justified. Whether it will be is up to the judge. If you are facing criminal charges, and don't have an attorney, thinking you can effectively defend yourself by asking for hints and tips here, you need to rethink your position. If this is in CoCal courts, and if you get serious about getting legal defense to try to keep you out of jail, feel free to contact me.
Your relative's dementia does not strike me as good cause to exclude the statement. It's a reason to doubt the statement's accuracy, but that goes to the statement's weight (meaning how much a jury should rely on it) rather than its admissibility. If the D.A. uses the statement you can try to show that it came from someone with dementia, but you probably can't prevent the D.A. from using it at all.
There may be other reasons why the statement would be inadmissible, however. Statements made outside of court are hearsay and are inadmissible unless they fall within one or more of the recognized exceptions to the hearsay rule. I do not have enough information to say whether this statement would be admissible or not. Either way, though, your relative's dementia is unlikely to be the deciding factor.
Related Questions & Answers
-
In 1994, I was working for a fast food restaurant in Fullerton, CA. I stole... Asked 9/06/09, 6:31 pm in United States California Criminal Law