Legal Question in Criminal Law in California
Recording Without Consent
Hypothetically speaking of course:
PersonA makes up a threatening email, creates marks on her body and takes digital photos. Then files for RO and DV case against PersonB, providing the email and photos as evidence.
PersonA makes several phone calls to PersonB. PersonB, having no proof to defend himself, decides to record the conversations in hopes that PersonA will confesses to making up the allegations. PersonA clearly admits to making up the email and not so clearly admits to making up the marks herself. Also claims that she did it all to gain full custody of their child.
This situation has caused significant emotional heartache to PersonB, both financially and emotionally. A lot of his friends and family has sided with PersonA because they believe her story.
QUESTION: Can PersonB use the recorded conversations to reveal the truth to friends & family without getting into any further trouble? Would the use of the audio, for the sole purpose to reveal the truth, in any way be considered illegal or committing a crime?
5 Answers from Attorneys
Re: Recording Without Consent
Penal Code section 633.5 permits such recordings only "for the purpose of obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission by another party to the communication of the crime of extortion, kidnapping, bribery, any felony involving violence against the person, or [making harassing phone calls]." Using false evidence to obtain a restraining order, to gain child custody or to press criminal charges is not on the list, so the exception does not apply.
However, if Person A also offered not to use the evidence in exchange for money or property from Person B, that would be an act of extortion. If A had extorted B before the recordings were made or, MAYBE, if B reasonably expected A to extort him when he made the recordings, then they might be admissible on that basis.
Person B is on very thin ice here. He should consult with a lawyer before trying to use the recording. He is welcome to contact me (Lawyer H) directly if he wants.
Re: Recording Without Consent
Hypothetically, of course...
You want to look at Penal Code section 632.7 - "Every person who, without consent of all parties to a communication, intercepts or receives and intentionally records . . . a communication... shall be punished by a fine not exceeding $2,500 or by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding one year or by imprisonment in the state prison."
There is an exception in Penal Code section 633.5 - "Nothing...prohibits one party to a confidential communication from recording the communication for the purpose of obtaining evidence reasonably believed to relate to the commission by another party to the communication of the crime of extortion, kidnapping, bribery or any felony involving violence against the person."
It sounds like you're facing criminal charges as well as a family court case. Anything you say to your attorney is confidential. Discuss this more fully with them before you admit to anyone what you've done.
Good luck.
Re: Recording Without Consent
Do not take any advice from this site or elsewhere other than 'say nothing' about the recording except to your retained attorney, and then listen to his advice. Whether you can assert an exception to the criminal code and use the recording depends on all the facts. If this is in SoCal courts, and you're serious about getting counsel to defend you on the RO and criminal charges, feel free to contact me.
Re: Recording Without Consent
Theoretically, you could possible use the recording at trial against you as a kamikaze last resort move. You would have criminal exposure most likely but the judge would not necessarily rule it inadmissible in the trial against you.
You should consult regarding your case only in a confidential consultation with an attorney. Feel free to contact my office.
Jacek W. Lentz, Esq.
310.273.1361
www.lentzlawfirm.com
Re: Recording Without Consent
One additional factor to consider. It appears that you had a telephone conversation with the protected party. That is a violation of the restraining order, even though the protected party made the telephone call.