Legal Question in Criminal Law in California
Is a written statement alone used against someone in court enough to convict them of (bank fraud) obtaining financial advantage by deception if they claim to have only viewed cctv footage and not have seen the teller serving a customer at the time a transaction was made?
Asked on 1/06/18, 4:06 pm
1 Answer from Attorneys
Terry A. Nelson
Nelson & Lawless
Written statements are generally not admissible in court in lieu of direct witness testimony.
Answered on 1/08/18, 11:00 am
Related Questions & Answers
-
If you have a troubled past and a conviction 20 years ago, and then again 11 years... Asked 1/02/18, 12:02 pm in United States California Criminal Law
-
Can sheriff come search my house at 2 am without search warrant? they were looking... Asked 12/22/17, 11:17 am in United States California Criminal Law
-
A family member has been incriminated for sexual abuse. I am the victim. He has a... Asked 12/20/17, 6:03 pm in United States California Criminal Law