Legal Question in Family Law in California
A contested judgment of nullity was entered and both persons were pro per. Ex is filing a 473b motion to set aside. Court date was continued because she did not appear. Court minutes state it is continued and court finds both parties were under represented as both were pro per. Does that mean the judge will likely set aside the judgment for a putative spouse hearing as x was found guilty of bigamy and jurisdiction was terminated? I did not think pro per litigants could get it set aside but now that they have a lawyer free from their union job they can?
1 Answer from Attorneys
You need to stop posting variations of the same question here and find an attorney to discuss the exact details of your case. This site is staffed by volunteer attorneys and we are not in the business of "handicapping" what will happen in a particular case that we have not been able to handle from the start and/or at least have access to the full facts and files. Your options are to hire an attorney to give you an opinion based on a full evaluation of the case, or take your chances in pro per. We have given you all the help the internet can give.
Related Questions & Answers
Looking for something else?
10,200 active attorneys ready to answer your legal questions today.
Featured Attorneys
Earn additional revenue and grow your business.
