Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California

I am in the middle of a civil litigation - with a new attorney coming in 4 weeks before trial date.

We are working on trial continuance, reschedule deposition dates, re open deposition cut off , however, the other party was quicker than us - They refused to change trial date and quickly filed an an EX PARTE MOTION TO COMPEL ATTENDANCE in discovery and SANCTIONS for money

"wasted" by me not showing up in the deposition date.

The other party was able to get a speeded court hearing for MOTION TO COMPEL - anybody has

strategy to counter this last minute legal assault - we want continuance to give new attorney more time to work on the case- should we just argue in front of the judge that we need the continuance

even though the issue for next hearing is Motion to Compel or is it still necessary to file the continuance request (irony is hearing for continance is past the actual trial date)

Anybody who has this case and input on how to strategize this problem.


Asked on 6/17/11, 2:19 pm

3 Answers from Attorneys

Aaron Feldman Feldman Law Group

You will need your own ex parte to have trial date motion heard sooner. Depending on County, discovery motion and trial date may not be before the same judge. Since the other side won't stipulate to a continuance, you need to move quickly to get a continuance. Your attorney will want to explain in response to the discovery motion that he is new to the case and if you were unrepresented when you failed to show for deposition (or whatever other extenuating circumstances exist). Good luck.

Read more
Answered on 6/17/11, 2:24 pm
Edward Hoffman Law Offices of Edward A. Hoffman

Since you now have an attorney, you should direct your questions to her rather than to us.

The other side's motion to compel your attendance at a deposition and their request for sanctions sound appropriate to me. Your outrage at "this legal assault" is misplaced, since the other side is acting quite properly. You were obliged to attend but didn't, and the other parties spent money for their lawyers and court reporter to be there. Parties who plan not to appear for a properly-noticed deposition should at least notify all the other parties (through their respective lawyers) of their plans ahead of time. Those who don't give such notice are responsible for paying all of the fees and costs the other parties incurred as a result, including those incurred in bringing the motion to compel. Even parties who do give such notice before missing their depositions are properly subject to a motion to compel and will usually be ordered to reimburse the fees and costs associated with the motion, though they won't have to pay for the additional costs of the depo they didn't attend.

In addition to monetary sanctions, your opponents can seek evidentiary or even terminating sanctions. Evidentiary sanctions are orders forbidding you to present certain evidence and directing jurors to resolve certain issues against you. Terminating sanctions are orders dismissing your pleadings and putting an end to your role in the case. If you are the plaintiff, that means you lose. If you are the defendant than the plaintiff will still have to prove his case, but you will not be allowed to contest it. Given how close you were to trial when you missed your deposition, the other side may very well be able to get such sanctions if their motion asks for them.

Good luck.

Read more
Answered on 6/17/11, 2:39 pm
Anthony Roach Law Office of Anthony A. Roach

Bringing in a new attorney does not justify refusing to go to a duly noticed deposition, or refusing to answer discovery. Personally, by changing attorneys just prior to trial, it sounds as though you are changing deck chairs on the Titanic.

Read more
Answered on 6/20/11, 8:16 am


Related Questions & Answers

More General Civil Litigation questions and answers in California