Legal Question in Civil Litigation in California
A woman was recently arrested for a hit & run accident. She was very drunk & accused my son of kidnapping & raping her then taking her home then taking her car. Three weeks after the incident the police came to his place of business to question him. Only one officer came & told him he was not under arrest but would he submit a dna sample. He gave the sample & has since been cleared.
Since she dragged my son's name through the mud for the past 3 weeks (we live in a small community) named him in a police report which we now know is false, is it possible to sue her for defamation of character/slander. This woman is in her 50's and my son in his 20's. She is financially well off and apparently thought this would not go so far. But this is truly beyond belief.
Is there anything he can do to right this wrong????? Our lives have been complete hell since she did this thing. Thank you for any help.
3 Answers from Attorneys
You can not sue her or police regarding the filing of criminal accusations and charges or investigating, etc. That is all completely protected activity., for obvious reasons.
However, if she also makes provably false and damaging statements to any other persons, you could sue for defamation if it makes economic sense to do so.
I would disagree slightly with Mr. Nelson.
A claim can be established in California for malicious prosecution, even though it is based on the defendant's filing of a knowingly false police report. As Mr. Nelson correctly notes, there is no claim for defamation or anything else based solely on the false report.
I also agree with Mr. Nelson that your son may well have claims for defamation based on this woman's statements to others -- the statements in the police report, however, are "off limits" for purposes of these other claims.
I strongly suggest that your son meet with a lawyer to discuss all the facts of this case, and obtain an opinion as to his chances of success and the cost of a lawsuit, before proceeding any further on this matter.
While I don't disagree with the previous answers, they leave out one key fact - an action for defamation requires proof of actual damages. Mere inchoate embarrassment, inconvenience, and tarnished reputation do not give rise to a legal claim for defamation. There must be actual damages such as lost employement or some other difinitive harm from the false statements. Otherwise there is no legally actionable claim for defamation.