Legal Question in Investment Law in California
My question is about when I want to sue a finiancial advisor who did not flowed proper FDIC roles and regurations, and sold me wrog product wher I lost all my saving , it would be better to go with albitrations or go to court.
Thanks
Allen
3 Answers from Attorneys
I need to review your documents to determine whether you have to go to court or arbitration. You may not have a choice. Often times financial advisors do not have your interest at heart, and sell you bad investments. I can help you look at your investments and understand what your financial advisor may have done wrong. I am also happy to look at possibly representing you. Please send me an email.
Best,
Daniel Bakondi, Esq.
415-450-0424
The Law Office of Daniel Bakondi, APLC
870 Market Street, Suite 1161
San Francisco CA 94102
http://www.danielbakondi.com
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential information, privileged information, or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient or received this message in error, any use or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited and unlawful. Please notify the sender immediately, and delete this message. No attorney-client nor confidential relationship is created through this communication. Nothing communicated or provided constitutes legal advice nor a legal opinion unless it so specifies and written agreement for attorney services has been entered into. Attorney licensed in California only. Your issue may be time sensitive and may result in loss of rights if you do not act in time. Thank you.
It's hard to predict whether you'll do better in court or in arbitration. The differences could include cost, quickness, and quality of justice. Going to court is the only way to have a jury decide questions of fact. In arbitration, you may have more choice of arbitrator than you'd have choice of judge. Arbitration might be done closer to home, or on a schedule you can control. Ultimately, however, you may not have a choice. A lot of contracts of this type require arbitration of disputes. Some make no provision for arbitration, in which case you're obliged to go to court unless the other party also consents to arbitration.
First, you need to determine IF you have grounds to make a claim, and whether you are bound to the securities broker 'claim' rules and arbitration. Generally lawsuit are preempted by those rules, and the contracts and agreements you had to sign to get your account opened. Simply losing money is not necessarily grounds for legal action, lots of people lose money in the market without recourse; you would have to prove illegal conduct or violations by the broker of his duties.
Check the website www. securitiesarbitration. us/stockbrokerdisputes. htm. html for an explanation and definition of the claims that could be brought. Remove the spaces that follow the periods in that address and paste the link into your browser.
After reading that, if you believe you have grounds to make a claim, feel free to contact me to discuss the facts and basis of your claims.
Related Questions & Answers
-
What is age of majority in CA for UTMA account? 18 or 21...25?? Asked 4/06/10, 10:23 am in United States California Investment Law