Legal Question in Employment Law in California

Hi,

I'm a young manager at a large corporation in California who also attends a part-time MBA program. The interesting part is that this program is located in Chicago, and I therefore have to fly to Chicago every Friday and return that Sunday to make this happen (if you're wondering, I chose that far away school as it's the top rated MBA school). To accommodate this, I asked my employer permission (when I was accepted to the school) and they agreed to let me travel on Fridays rather than coming into the office that day, and also agreed I could work from home on those days when not traveling. Although I was never considered a part-time employee, the inherent restraints to this setup are pretty obvious I feel.

This worked fine for about a year, however as the demands of my job have recently increased as the company has downsized. I've been tasked with learning a new skillset and my performance ratings have started to drop as my boss has continually shown concern for my MBA travel setup. As a side note, I've been with the company for 5 years, and for the first 4 years I was consistently rated as one of the top handful of employees on performance reviews. Rather than attributing my recent lower performance ratings to the MBA setup (which I think they're figured out would be a liability for them as they've acknowledged that I have a contract with the company in this regard), they're instead saying that I don't communicate well and am no longer as reliable (which I atrribute to the side effects of asking am employee with my setup to increase responsibility). I have gotten along with all bosses in the past, but I must also acknowledge that this boss and I have never gotten along- she has a reputation for being difficult and a micro-manager.

The bottom line: I no longer intend to stay at the company, as recruiting through the MBA school will offer a much better job, and secondly I can leave what has become a stressful working situation with my new boss. However I do not want to be fired and feel that, given the scenario and the fact that they need a full time employee (even though they won't acknowledge that I'm not a full-time employee, despite the obvious fact that I leave for the airport every Friday before noon), firing would not be just given the dynamics of this arrangement. I would instead argue that they would have to "lay me off" and that the increase in job responsibilities lately, combined with the MBA agreement, has made a scenario that previously worked no longer work- albeit one they fully agreed to. I don't argue that I am no longer the best fit, but don't want a firing on my resume, and would like to receive severance if I can get it.

Questions:

1. Could they fire me, or would they most likely lay me off (especially if I rasie the issue proactively and try to be helpful)?

2. Should I go to HR proactively, tell them that it's not working out, but offer to help them find and train someone and request that they lay me off (so I can receive severance) and avoid the firing?

3. Due to the nuances of this, would they risk firing me, rather than laying me off, due to the potential claim that I may or may not have?

4. If I go to HR, do I have any rights to confidentiality or can they just go to my boss if they please?

Thanks for any thoughts!!

Steve


Asked on 7/22/10, 10:32 am

2 Answers from Attorneys

Michael Kirschbaum Law Offices of Michael R. Kirschbaum

I will not attempt to answer your questions specifically, nor offer any legal advise, as that is something that should only be done with an attorney, after you have spent some time with him or her discussing the full scenario. Attorneys will ask you many questions before they can begin to address the questions you pose here. This forum is best used for general legal concepts.

Having said that, you need to keep in mind that most employment in California is presumed to be terminable at the will of either the employer or the employee. I believe most experienced employment law attorneys will tell you that whenever an employer believes the employee's interests are not in line with those of the employer, the employer will terminate the relationship. And they can do so, lawfully, as long as no contract is being breached or statute is being violated. Your statement does not indicate that either applies here, so it is not clear what potential claim you are referring to.

We regularly see situations where an employee tells their employer they are thinking of leaving, or even graciously gives advance notice they are leaving, only to find the employer terminates the relationship immediately. They usually do this to avoid potential damage a lame duck employee may cause and do not want an employee around who does not want to be there. This is also legal in at-will employment.

You should also know that what you discuss with human resources is not considered confidential, as it applies to your employment within the company. If the person you speak with believes your boss should know what you share with them, they have the right to tell your boss in the best interest of the company.

Bottom line: You have no control over what the employer may or may not do or how it may designate your separation. You can only control your own actions. You have the right to resign at any time. They have the right to terminate you. I always advise my clients to look out for their own best interests because you know that is what the employer will do.

If you wish to obtain specific legal advise, I suggest you schedule time to meet with an attorney to discuss your situation and options.

Read more
Answered on 7/22/10, 2:15 pm
Terry A. Nelson Nelson & Lawless

What you'd like, and what you'll get, may be two entirely different things. The employer is entitled to set and change hours, duties, titles, compensation, benefits, leaves, vacations, holidays, policies, rules, etc. just not retroactively. You are free to quit any time. They are free to fire you any time - you are an 'at will' employee. In general, unless an employee is civil service, in a union, or has a written employment contract, they are an 'at will' employee that can be disciplined or fired any time for any reason, with or without �cause� or explanation. The employee's goal should be to keep the employer happy. The employer's goal should be to keep you happy, but they are not obligated to do so., nor to treat you 'fairly', nor to offer you severance, nor to 'lay you off' just because you would like that. You can quit, or you can try to negotiate some termination deal. But, they can, and may, terminate you abruptly 'for cause' any time they learn you don't intend to stay. Now, with that new found education, if you are serious about hiring counsel to help you 'try' to negotiate a termination/severance package, feel free to contact me. I've been doing these for years. IF the company thinks highly of you, and wishes you the best, it may be possible to do so. No guarantees.

Read more
Answered on 7/22/10, 4:33 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Labor and Employment Law questions and answers in California