Legal Question in Medical Malpractice in California

I just found out after extensive testing at the Mayo clinic that there is a strong possibility that over 4 years ago after the c section birth of my daughter the doctor may have left part of the placenta in my uterus. I have been having pain and bleeding for 4 years. I went to him a few times and he did a procedure called ablation and I believe a d and c but the bleeding has not stopped and the pain is still there I went to the mayo clinic to have it diagnosed and they still running tests to see the outcome but they say it is 25-30% uterine cancer or 70-75% chance it is placenta left in by the doctor. I am curios about both of these as far as negligence on the part of the doctor. He may have caused injury to my body and I am not sure yet but it is possible that if placenta was left in that long it could have caused cancer. I signed some sort of arbitration agreement when he first saw me but I cannot imagine it covers negligence. can you advise I have suffered with constant bleeding and pain for 4 years now.


Asked on 7/24/10, 5:57 pm

3 Answers from Attorneys

Carl Starrett Law Offices of Carl H. Starrett II

You should see an attorney right away. The facts that you describe cold lead to a claim for legal malpractice, but the statute of limitation may have expired. Also, it is impossible to say if the arbitration clause covers a malpractice action without reading the clause. Show it to your attorney, but make an appointment as soon as possible.

Read more
Answered on 7/25/10, 11:35 am
Daniel Bakondi The Law Office of Daniel Bakondi

Would be curious as to your evidence and how you can prove what the doctor did wrong.

Best,

Daniel Bakondi, Esq.

[email protected]

415-450-0424

The Law Office of Daniel Bakondi, APLC

870 Market Street, Suite 1161

San Francisco CA 94102

http://www.danielbakondi.com

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This communication may contain confidential information, privileged information, or attorney work product. If you are not the intended recipient or received this message in error, any use or distribution of this message is strictly prohibited and unlawful. Please notify the sender immediately, and delete this message. No attorney-client nor confidential relationship is created through this communication. Nothing communicated or provided constitutes legal advice nor a legal opinion unless it so specifies and written agreement for attorney services has been entered into. Attorney licensed in California only. Your issue may be time sensitive and may result in loss of rights if you do not act in time. Thank you.

Read more
Answered on 7/25/10, 10:30 pm
Terry A. Nelson Nelson & Lawless

Sorry, but -- for medical malpractice actions:

... commencement of action shall be three years after the date of injury or one year after the plaintiff discovers, or through the use of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the injury, whichever occurs FIRST. In no event shall the time for commencement of legal action exceed three years ...

Read more
Answered on 7/26/10, 2:57 pm


Related Questions & Answers

More Medical Malpractice Law questions and answers in California