Legal Question in Business Law in Illinois
401K Transfers when one company buys another
I worked for a mutual insurance company. The company went under, and a portion of it was bought by an equity holding firm. They are telling us we must transfer our existing 401K accounts into their plan by law. However, their plan does not offer what I want, and I am very unhappy about having my 100% vested account forced into something I do not want. Is it legal for them to force us into their plan rather than rolling over the funds or leaving them where they are? We were effectively terminated from the old company and hired by the new July 26th, 2003. They are performing the transfers over the next four months, where we are ''blacked out'' from repaying loans or taking withdrawals.
Thank You ---name removed--Hansen
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: 401K Transfers when one company buys another
I find it hard to believe that an acquirer has the ability to force you to rollover your 401(k) account to their plan. The old company is terminating the plan and in those circumstances, generally you have a right to various distribution options, including partial or complete rollover to an IRA or employer plan of YOUR CHOICE because of that event, regardless of what your new employer is telling you. Because the current plan sponsor went under, leaving your money in the old plan is probably not an option. However, leaving your money with the old plan's investment advisors may be an option, depending on whether the adivsors sponsor IRAs or other vehicles appropriate to your circumstances. And, pursuant to the plan termination, you should have received information on all of these options a reasonable time, usually 90 days, before the decision of what to do with your money has to be made.
The good news is that ERISA provides for attorney fees if you choose to challenge your new employer's interpretation, but my hope would be that your situation won't get that far. You should consider consulting an attorney skilled in ERISA and other labor law issues to obtain what you want. You may also contact the US Department of Labor, and ask them to look into the situation at no cost to you.
Before "stirring the pot", I recommend that you make sure you are hired by the new company first, if that is your choice. That way, if you lose your job because of "troublemaking", you would have a better set of facts for yet another suit for wrongful discharge.
Our comments are based on treating your question as a hypothetical. Accordingly, our comments could be substantially and materially different were we advised of all of the relevant facts and circumstances. Our comments are by necessity general in nature, and should not be relied upon in taking or forgoing action in your circumstances without retaining an attorney. In order to fully explore your legal matter, you should meet with us or another attorney and bring to any such meeting all relevant documents and correspondence, and any other relevant facts.
We are not hired to be your attorney, and no attorney-client relationship exists between us, unless and until you enter into a written retainer agreement with us, tender the agreed amount for a retainer and it is accepted by us. We reserve the right to decline representation should circumstances change.
As you are aware, in Illinois there are various deadlines for filing a complaint, filing an answer to a complaint, or taking other action in order to preserve your legal rights, and avoid a complete loss of those rights. You should retain counsel immediately in order to be fully advised of your rights, and to be fully informed of the applicable time period within which those rights must be asserted. If you were to delay in doing so, it might result in your potential cause of action being forever barred.
Related Questions & Answers
-
Arbitration on mutual contract breach IL co. sold our assets to a Oregon co. This... Asked 9/07/03, 12:16 am in United States Illinois Business Law
-
A company stole my invention Many years ago I invented something. I sent the idea to... Asked 9/03/03, 10:46 pm in United States Illinois Business Law