Legal Question in Technology Law in Illinois
We hired a programmer to help us write code for the back-end of a startup website. There were no written or signed contracts; everything was communicated verbally. Furthermore, it was established that there would be no cash compensation and the only form of compensation would be through equity (declared liquid). After the programmer had written a few blocks of code, he missed required deadlines and went on vacation. Although he has not been dismissed from the company formally, his lack of communication for the month thereafter suggested that he was no longer with us.
Later, once the company launched the product, the programmer contacted us and demanded a large sum of money for his work. He declared that he put in 60 hours of work into the project and billed us accordingly. However, one of the other partners of the company took the code that he had written (which, keep in mind, is very BASIC MySQL and PHP programming that anybody could accomplish after a few hours looking at tutorials online) and modified it heavily. The functionality of the original code now comprises only a very, VERY small portion of the production code, and the code was not copied verbatim.
He now plans to take retaliatory measures to "punish" us for our actions. On what legal basis does he have to hold a case against us in court?
2 Answers from Attorneys
The answer lies in copyright law. Your description did not describe that the agreement that you had with the programmer was a work for hire. Therefore, the programmer is an independent contractor with all rights to his workproduct expressed in a tangible media. He owns what he created for your company. Your program can be considered to be derived from his product and you are probably in violation of his copyright. Even though you modified it extensively, rather than starting over, fair use is not a defense because of the commercial nature of the transaction.
I would suggest that you or an attorney negotiate a settlement for the work, rather than going to trial. There are many plaintiff attorneys who would represent the programmer for a percentage of the recovery. I would avoid litigation if you can.
Good luck!
I come out on the other side of this question. Copyright would not likely be violated by a heavily modified code, particularly if you take precautionary steps to protect yourself. You would do well to take the position it was basically "totally rewritten" rather than "modified" or "supplemented" or even "still exists" and you should be telling him (hopefully correctly) that what he provided was of no use, was ditched, and no longer exists. Then you need to get his stuff (except non-creative common stuff) out of the program. I think plaintiff's lawyers taking this loser copyright case on a contingency for the programmer would be foolish in Illinois. However, there is a serious lesson here. You need to have "work for hire" agreements with ALL your programmers, artists, authors, etc. You also need to have patent agreements, as you have not apparently even considered that aspect. You are going to get in serious trouble if you keep doing this stuff verbally or without legal help.
I can help you on this if you call. There is quite a bit you can do to insulate yourself from the "many plaintiff attorneys who would represent the programmer for a percentage of the recovery" and you need to do that sooner rather than later. If you try to cleanse the program AFTER you get sued it won't work, in my opinion, and could even make the situation worse. But, if you do it now, it will nearly always be effective. Don't get scared by the prior comment, but BE WARNED! You are currently heading down a path leading to a "legal cliff". Best make a detour so you don't go crashing over the edge. The impact at the bottom of the cliff could be ugly..