Legal Question in Civil Litigation in New York
Time frame to have a small claims case reopened
Hello, I filed 2 claims and received 2 judgments against a contractor in small claims court in Queens, a little over a year ago.. On the first claim, 2 times in the year, the defendent tried to vacate the default judgement by order of showing cause. He failed to show up on both occasions,so the original judgement was upheld (July 2004). With my second claim- he also filed 2 order to show cause to vacate the default judgement. The firt time, he did not show, however on the second time, he showed up and postponed it to a later date, then he did not show. So in January 2005, I received the other default judgment. My question is- I am afraid to go down to the marhsalls office, because he might try to vacate the judgements again, can he do this? Is there any time limit on when a case can be reopened? Or do you have any suggestions on what I should do now with the two judgments I have? This contractor is obviously aware of how the court system works and is abusing the courts time.
1 Answer from Attorneys
Re: Time frame to have a small claims case reopened
You do not state the grounds upon which the defendant sought to open his default, but in general, in order to open a default one must demonstrate both a reasonable excuse for the default and the existence of a meritorious defense. As well, a motion (or order to show cause) to open a default must be brought within a reasonable time after the defendant learns of the default. I would suggest you arrange to serve your default judgments on the defendant and then take whatever steps are necessary to collect them. I believe the clerk in Small Claims Court may be able to advise you in that regard--although you appear to know about that since you mentioned going to the marshal. With regard to the defendant�s practice of serving orders to show cause to open the default and then failing to show up, if this defendant does it again, after having twice tried and defaulted, you might respond by asking the court to fine the defendant for bringing a �frivolous� motion. In that regard, 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 (a) provides that a court may impose financial sanctions in a civil action or proceeding against a party who engages in frivolous conduct. Frivolous conduct is defined by, among other things, conduct which is undertaken primarily to delay or prolong the resolution of litigation. I hope this response is helpful to you.