Legal Question in Real Estate Law in Wisconsin

leaking roof

I sold my house in oct 05. In the amendment to purchase the buyer noted to fix small back roof with flat roof and noted buyers will repair interior wall. So I had my parents repair this roof with a flat roof, now the buyer called me several months later and told me roof was still leaking. When i went over there I told them the roof probably didnt seal because of the winter months when we did this. I gave them a tarp to cover the roof till spring and noticed a board was hanging off the house where they said the roof was leaking. I told them to nail the board back up and that probably will solve the problem. Thoughout the winter months i drove by multiple times and seen the board still hanging there and tarp never put in. The buyer called me back in May 06 and told me about roof still leaking and wanted me to pay for it. Now its Aug 06 and he is bringing me to small claims court for a total of 1500.00 cost of new rubber roof and interior wall damage. Am i responsible to pay for this or not.


Asked on 8/06/06, 11:05 pm

1 Answer from Attorneys

JAY Nixon nixon law offices

Home Buyer Claim Against Seller for Leaking Roof

A real estate purchase contract will determine liability for real estate defects following a closing (if the standard Wisconsin Board of Realtors forms are used). If the sellers disclose defects in writing in the form called the �property condition report,� and the buyer does not reject the sale due to the problem, the buyer is more or less stuck with it. If, however, the seller fails to disclose a known problem or misrepresents the condition of the property on the disclosure form, the seller is liable for the repair costs. Sellers are also liable for the buyer's attorney fees in the event of such a misrepresentation. As with all legal rules, there are many �grey areas.� Therefore, this is (as usual) a vastly over-simplified explanation. Exceptions can included conditions which are obvious, and a perrential issue is whether or not other representations maded outside the closing documents may be considered to be adequate disclosure. Surprising, outside statements about a condition not reproduced in the closing forms may not always save a seller. Also (as always) no lawyer can intelligently advise anyone without thoroughly investigating the situation and reviewing all documents.

Read more
Answered on 8/07/06, 8:23 am


Related Questions & Answers

More Real Estate and Real Property questions and answers in Wisconsin