Legal Question in Real Estate Law in California
I purchased a property 2 years ago and now have massive mold issues requiring complete replacement of walls. Seller did not disclose any issues. Now I've found out that the seller knew when they bought the place 2 years previously, that the then seller DID disclose mold and that was the reason they were selling as his wife was pregnant. I haven't been able to live in the place for months as the HOA and contractors haggle about repairs. What are my remedies?
1 Answer from Attorneys
You, most likely, have an action against the seller for the non-disclosure. You may recall that, in your purchase, you received a document entitled, "Transfer Disclosure Statement." (TDS) California requires material defects to be disclosed, on that form, and serious mold issues fits into what must be disclosed. My office handles TDS cases. In cases like yours, you would seek money for fixing the problem, for relocating, during the repairs, for the value of losing your home, for legal costs and attorney fees. If you have any health problems, as a result of the mold, medical expenses and general damages (e.g. emotional distress, inconvenience) would also be available. My experience is that most people do not have medical problems from mold, unless they are particularly susceptible, because of an allergy or other condition, or they have long-term exposure. There are strict statutes of limitations on actions, such as your. Some can be 2 years. Others 3 years. I suggest you contact an attorney, right away. Your attorney will review the sellers' liability as well as possible liability by others. For example, sometimes (not too often), a real estate broker may have liability. Also, your HOA's liability needs to be examined.
Good luck to you.